Joe*Battlelines Forum Index Joe*Battlelines
The "Old School" Edition
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Did they cheat or not?
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Joe*Battlelines Forum Index -> J. S. P. N. - The Joe Sports Network
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
M6D
Magnum6Delta.com


Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 1313
Location: Austin, TX

PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The best part... it was Belichick's form D Coordinator that brought the issue up to the league. He even admits he knew of the practice when he was with the team.

ESPN wrote:
When Eric came, he said that's what they used to do. Bill is going to be [ticked] at Eric. He kissed and told."


Gee Eric, if it's such a problem why didn't you bring it up when you were winning Superbowls with the team?

hypocrite or sore loser... take your pick.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
pbarny
Greenshirt


Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 44
Location: Hopefully in a universe far away from here

PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

M6D wrote:

Gee Eric, if it's such a problem why didn't you bring it up when you were winning Superbowls with the team?

hypocrite or sore loser... take your pick.


A coach/player/whatever's loyalty is to the organization paying you. If it was a big deal, why wasn't it mentioned by him last year? Obviously he spotted it, and owing nothing to the Pats because he's a Jets employee now, he informed the league.
_________________
Me on Facebook
Add Yoursel to MY MAP
In China Bill Gates is Britney Spears; in America Britney Spears is Britney Spears-- that's our problem--Tom Friedman
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Maximus
Sergeant First Class


Joined: 24 Jan 2006
Posts: 768
Location: Lancaster, PA

PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This whole thing seems so shady to me. I don't know 100% the ins and outs of football, but I'm guessing a team doesn't change its signals that often. Sure that tape might not have helped the Pats out this past weekend, but seeing as how these teams are in the same division they'll play again this year. I agree that even if you know what's coming you still have to stop it, but it definatley gives an unfair advantage to the offense.

I'm not going to crucify the Pats for doing what I'm sure goes on in most teams, but I don't think its right to blame the NFL. I read an article yesterday that basically said its the NFL's fault teams cheat because they don't do more to stop it. WHAT?!? That's the same backwards logic as saying its McDonald's fault that I'm overweight. Sure I know right from wrong and if I keep eating McDonald's less than healthy food my stomach will continue getting larger, but that's not my fault right? McD's food is so much easier to get than grocery shopping, cooking, cleaning up the dishes..... It's nobody's fault but my own that I don't eat healthy. Its a CHOICE I make. Its not the NFL's fault that teams cheat. People within the organizations make a CHOICE to cheat. The BS that the media is throwing around drives me CRAZY!!!!!!!!

Shame on you New England for cheating when you're supposedly a football dynasty. I don't know how other fans feel, but it certainly takes away some respect for what they've been able to accomplish over the past few years. Losing so many big name players and coaches, but still being in the title hunt each year.

On a side note I wonder if this will help get headsets put into a defensive player's helmet. Then the Defensive coordinators could cover their mouths to call in plays the same way the offensive coordinators do.....
_________________
"Why not just make 10 louder?"

"These go up to 11."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
M6D
Magnum6Delta.com


Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 1313
Location: Austin, TX

PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 3:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maximus wrote:
On a side note I wonder if this will help get headsets put into a defensive player's helmet. Then the Defensive coordinators could cover their mouths to call in plays the same way the offensive coordinators do.....


I honestly don't see why the headset logic is applied to the offensive side of the ball, but not the defense.

Make the Middle LB or Defensive Captain the QB of the defense and put a headset into his helmet. Apply the same rules to the defense as the offensive side of the ball and your problem is solved.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
General Hawk
GeneralsJoes.com
GeneralsJoes.com


Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 3544
Location: Northeast Boondocks

PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 3:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

M6D wrote:
Maximus wrote:
On a side note I wonder if this will help get headsets put into a defensive player's helmet. Then the Defensive coordinators could cover their mouths to call in plays the same way the offensive coordinators do.....


I honestly don't see why the headset logic is applied to the offensive side of the ball, but not the defense.

Make the Middle LB or Defensive Captain the QB of the defense and put a headset into his helmet. Apply the same rules to the defense as the offensive side of the ball and your problem is solved.


Exactly. They brought this up in the off season, but it didn't pass...don't ask me why.

Justin
_________________
Misdirection has arrived!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
pbarny
Greenshirt


Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 44
Location: Hopefully in a universe far away from here

PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 3:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

M6D wrote:
Maximus wrote:
On a side note I wonder if this will help get headsets put into a defensive player's helmet. Then the Defensive coordinators could cover their mouths to call in plays the same way the offensive coordinators do.....


I honestly don't see why the headset logic is applied to the offensive side of the ball, but not the defense.

Make the Middle LB or Defensive Captain the QB of the defense and put a headset into his helmet. Apply the same rules to the defense as the offensive side of the ball and your problem is solved.


Simple, it was argued by the competition committee that due to high number of defensive substitutions it wouldn't be practical or may lead to an unfair advantage with multiple players on the field with the headset. It works on offense because in theory the QB is on the field for every offensive play and is the only QB on the field at anyone time. The measure was close, failing by 2 votes needed for the super majority required to bring a rules change to the full ownership for vote requiring another super majority to implement.
_________________
Me on Facebook
Add Yoursel to MY MAP
In China Bill Gates is Britney Spears; in America Britney Spears is Britney Spears-- that's our problem--Tom Friedman
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Southzen
First Sergeant


Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 1477
Location: Southern Louisiana

PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 4:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think a head set should be used on defense; why can't the defensive captain and a couple others where them and relay the message/audibles and such. Of course, the fact that a QB wears one is coming into question more and more.
_________________
Because my opinion is so important, I must post it for everyone to read.

Honoring all those who lost and were lost to hurricanes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
pbarny
Greenshirt


Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 44
Location: Hopefully in a universe far away from here

PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 4:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think wrist bands are more practical for defenses. They'll allow you to change what the color and number and maybe letter are each week and you can make it pretty complex provided no one loses the flash cards. This solves the problem of having too many wired for sound on the field, there's no rule against it right now and you can even work in a league sponsor to make your the wrist band with multiple flaps for for insertion of your paper schemes.

Also, don't forget the college football solution to stealing signals...they usually have 2 or 3 backups/red shirts flashing signals in. Depending on down being even or odd, the signal is hot or a decoy.
_________________
Me on Facebook
Add Yoursel to MY MAP
In China Bill Gates is Britney Spears; in America Britney Spears is Britney Spears-- that's our problem--Tom Friedman
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Smokescreen
Rainbow Brite's #1 Fan!
Rainbow Brite's #1 Fan!


Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 2654
Location: Indianapolis

PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 4:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I asked my buddy this as I have never played organized football, so I don't know... But what's the difference from what was done... Watching the coach, and watching game film of the plays and how you played against them? Unless the camera was wired directly to the defensives guys up in the box for the Pats, they really couldn't have used them for the game, right? Or, am I missing something?

Like I said, I didn't know what the difference was. I mean, watching game films, you can learn the defense and how they react to your plays for the next game?
_________________
Makes you want to taste the rainbow!



The Heralded Hall of Hunger
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
pbarny
Greenshirt


Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 44
Location: Hopefully in a universe far away from here

PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 5:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Smokescreen wrote:
I asked my buddy this as I have never played organized football, so I don't know... But what's the difference from what was done... Watching the coach, and watching game film of the plays and how you played against them? Unless the camera was wired directly to the defensives guys up in the box for the Pats, they really couldn't have used them for the game, right? Or, am I missing something?

Like I said, I didn't know what the difference was. I mean, watching game films, you can learn the defense and how they react to your plays for the next game?


What you learn from game film is how an offense or defense works at a particular down and distance. Watching game film will lead you to follow trends. In high school, one team would constantly have its guards line up 6 inches farther back if they pulled. We'd see the guard lined up and tell our defensive tackles to collapse a trap play.

At the snap, you don't know the play on defense, blitz, zone, man, etc. As an offense, you have to read, and react. If you knew what the defense was going to do before hand, because you knew the signal, you're hot route or read could be run automatically and not because you're reading the defense. It wouldn't have made a difference the first time, but the second time they play it would. Now the Jets would be stupid not to change signals, but the complexity of an NFL defense could warrant the changing of signals impossible. Eventually though, how much time do you waste as a coaching staff by breaking down the signals and the defensive plays versus preparing your own players and plays for the weeks game plan?

The NFL says you can watch the coaches/sidelines with your own eyes. You can videotape it even from the stands or press box/coaching boxes, but these will be semi-obstructed views, from the sidelines ir probably isn't. You are expressly forbidden from doing it from the sidelines and have been reminded about it. This is not about competition but their money. It is about pleasing CBS, Fox, NBC and ESPN by banning all cameras outside of theirs from the sidelines.

In the end, there are rules written. And Roger Goddell has shown that you break a rule, you will be punished to the fullest extent and beyond to serve as a deterrent to further breaking of the rules.
_________________
Me on Facebook
Add Yoursel to MY MAP
In China Bill Gates is Britney Spears; in America Britney Spears is Britney Spears-- that's our problem--Tom Friedman
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
cmderinchief
VAMO!!


Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 177
Location: Indianapolis, IN

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 12:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DAAAAAA-YUM!!! ESPN reports that the coach was fined $500K, the team another $250K PLUS the loss of their first round pick if they make the playoffs.

That is almost as stiff as the FIA penalty handed down to McLaren-Mercedes in F1 ($100 Mil fine and DQ from '07 and '08 Constructors Championships).
_________________
The one and only! * As seen on the TNI, Joesightings and GIJCC Forums

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Maximus
Sergeant First Class


Joined: 24 Jan 2006
Posts: 768
Location: Lancaster, PA

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 10:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

And if they don't make the playoffs they'll lose 2nd and 3rd round picks! I'm glad Goodell brought the hammer down. Not because I hate the Pats or anything like that (although I do think a bit less of them after this), but because Goodell made it know he's going after players that put a black mark on the league so it seems only right to hold the coaches to similar standards and punishments as well.

What really bugs me about this is Mangini gave someone in the Jets oranization (not sure if it was security directly or someone else on the sidelines) a head's up to keep an eye open for this. Is that because he heard of the rumors from Green Bay last year OR (and I think a more likely scenario) has this been a common practice for the Pats for at least the past three years? If that's the case it certainly makes this team seem a lot less special in my mind.
_________________
"Why not just make 10 louder?"

"These go up to 11."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Red Sox
Sergeant


Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 261
Location: Central Massachusetts

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 1:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If the Patriots "cheated" then every team in the league cheats because they all try to steal signs. The only rule the Patriots broke was filming from the sidelines, and there is a rule against that not to protect teams from having their signs stolen, but only to protect the NFL's sideline footage for tv and NFL films BS. It's all about the NFL's profits and has zero to do with integrity or protecting defensive signals.

Proof of teams/coaches stealing signals from SI/Mike Shannahan.
_________________
<img src="http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n151/BCGreenwood/Project1.jpg" border="0" alt="Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket">
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Goldbug
Sergeant First Class


Joined: 13 Aug 2005
Posts: 618
Location: IL

PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 2:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Red Sox wrote:
If the Patriots "cheated" then every team in the league cheats because they all try to steal signs. The only rule the Patriots broke was filming from the sidelines, and there is a rule against that not to protect teams from having their signs stolen, but only to protect the NFL's sideline footage for tv and NFL films BS. It's all about the NFL's profits and has zero to do with integrity or protecting defensive signals.

Proof of teams/coaches stealing signals from SI/Mike Shannahan.


Yes those Bills sure love to cheat. Rolling Eyes
Apparently according to John Madden they were directly filming the opposite coaches as they were throwing signs. It is one thing to steal signs & another to film the signs. Then they can use the footage to decypher the signs. Also maybe use them in the next game obviously vs division rivals.
Still don't understand why they even needed to cheat.
_________________
TRADE LIST
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Joe*Battlelines Forum Index -> J. S. P. N. - The Joe Sports Network All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group